• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

C. Darden

GVVK v. State, No. 29A02-1012-CR-1418, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 5, 2011).

October 7, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Darden

Modification of D felony operating while habitual traffic violator to A misdemeanor changes also provides that defendant’s driving privileges are suspended, not forfeited.

Robinson v. State, No. 49A02-1101-CR-13, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 5, 2011).

October 7, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Darden

Probable cause affidavit with “multiple levels of hearsay” did not pass the “substantial trustworthiness” test required by a probation revocation subject’s confrontation right.

P.J. v. State, No. 49A05-1102-JV-121, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 5, 2011).

October 7, 2011 Filed Under: Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, C. Darden

A juvenile who enters into a plea agreement to pay a specific amount of restitution waives his right to have the juvenile court inquire into his ability to pay, as he has acknowledges such ability in his plea agreement.

Arthur v. State, No. 28A01-1008-CR-489, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 8, 2011)

June 10, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Darden

2010 community corrections home detention credit time amendment is not limited only to persons subject to an IC 35-38-2.6-1 “direct commitment” to community corrections, as “it would indeed be illogical to interpret the statute so as to allow the offender to earn credit time when placed on a home detention community corrections program only if it is a direct placement of an offender who has committed an offense for which no portion of the sentence may be suspended.”

Eppl v. DiGiacomo, No. 45A03-1007-SC-402, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., May 4, 2011)

May 6, 2011 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, C. Darden

Tenant’s mere delivery of the keys is not sufficient to demonstrate that landlord accepted surrender of the premises; thus the end of the month, in a month-to-month tenancy, started the security deposit statute’s 45-day clock for the landlord to provide the itemization of charges against the security deposit.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Go to page 4
  • Go to page 5
  • Go to page 6
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 9
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs