• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

C. Darden

Cartwright v. State, No. 65A01-1404-CR-170, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 25, 2015).

February 26, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Darden, J. Baker

Search warrant was erroneously issued, as the application did not establish the informant’s reliability, and the good faith exception could not save the search

Moss v. State, No. 49A02-1307-CR-618, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 20, 2014).

March 20, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Darden

When defendant had his prior felony conviction reduced to a misdemeanor, after he was charged in this case with C felony handgun without a license based on the prior felony, his motion to dismiss the C felony should have been granted even though he had the prior felony conviction when the handgun offense was committed.

Guilmette v. State, No. 71A04-1205-CR-250, __ N.E.2 __ (Ind. Ct. App., Apr. 22, 2013).

April 25, 2013 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Darden

When authorities have taken an inmate’s clothing for inventory and safekeeping while he awaits trial, the Indiana Constitution requires that they must obtain a warrant to test the clothing regarding an unrelated, uncharged crime.

Stutz v. State, No. 49A02-1110-CR-960, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 5, 2012).

July 5, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Darden

“[C]lass A misdemeanor operating a vehicle with a BAC of at least .15 percent is not a lesser included offense of class C misdemeanor operating while intoxicated.”

Walters v. Austin, No. 20A04-1106-CT-342,___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., April 18, 2012).

April 19, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, C. Darden, E. Najam

The amended motion to correct error was a repetitive motion and so the filing of the amended motion did not change the date for filing the notice of appeal.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Go to page 4
  • Go to page 5
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 9
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs