An informant’s declaration against penal interest can furnish sufficient basis for establishing the informant’s credibility.
Appeals
Reece v. Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc., No. 20A-CT-214, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 20, 2020).
Defendant was not negligent when its grass grew so high that the grass blocked the view at the intersection because the “dangerous condition” was confined to defendant’s property.
King v. State, No. 20A-CR-6, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 13, 2020).
Driver’s license suspension with no controlling words such as “until” or “to” expires on 12:00 a.m. on the listed date and is no longer in effect from the beginning of that day; not 11:59 p.m.
Salhab v. State, No. 19A-CR-3059, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 10, 2020).
A probation condition that requires a defendant to refrain from visiting “businesses that sell sexual devices or aids” is unconstitutionally vague.
State v. Ellis, No. 20A-CR-61, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 10, 2020).
Community corrections participants “who have consented or been clearly informed that the conditions of their…community corrections program unambiguously authorize warrantless and suspicionless searches may thereafter be subject to such searches during the period of their . . . community corrections status.”