• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Wihebrink v. State, No. 20S-CR-632, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 24, 2022).

January 24, 2022 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam, N. Vaidik

An appeal waiver, despite a challenge to aggravators or mitigators found by the trial court at the time of sentencing, is enforceable because such a challenge is not one of illegality.

Ceres Solutions Coop., Inc. v. Estate of Bradley, No. 21A-CT-377, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 12, 2022).

January 18, 2022 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb

For the bystander rule for negligent infliction of emotional distress, explosion and subsequent fire are not separate injury-producing events for purposes of the temporal factor. Also, the plaintiff did not need to see the body of his wife being removed from the exploded house when he possessed a reasonable degree of certainty that she had been in the house at the time of the explosion.

Ind. Repertory Theatre, No. 21A-PL-628, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 4, 2022).

January 10, 2022 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

Insurance policy language “direct physical loss or direct physical damage” did not encompass theatre’s claim for loss of use of its facilities during the COVID-19 pandemic

Marshall v. State, No. 21A-CR-1123, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 7, 2022).

January 10, 2022 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown

Upon a request for self-representation, the defendant should be made aware of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation, so that the record will establish a knowing and intelligent decision.

Nick’s Packing Svcs., Inc. v. Chaney, No. 21A-SC-820, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 27, 2021).

January 3, 2022 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

Company who removed resident’s possessions during an eviction was a bailee of a mutual benefit bailment and had a duty to exercise ordinary care with resident’s possessions.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 62
  • Page 63
  • Page 64
  • Page 65
  • Page 66
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 408
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs