CHINS fact-finding hearing and dispositional hearings were properly continued for good cause pursuant to Trial Rule 53.5.
Appeals
Gliva v. State, No. 21A-CR-332, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 7, 2021).
The unaware prong of the sexual battery statute — Ind. Code § 35-42-4-8(a)(2) — applies when the victim lacks knowledge or acquaintance of the touching or is unconscious of the touching as the touching is occurring. Unawareness that the touching is going to occur alone does not satisfy the provision.
In re Termination of Parent-Child Relationship of I.L., No. 21A-JT-418, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 5, 2021).
Remote proceedings for a termination of parental rights hearing did not deprive mother of her due process rights.
Blake v. State, No. 201-CR-405, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 28, 2021).
The Covid-19 pandemic constituted an emergency for purposes of Criminal Rule 4(B
Beachey v. State, No. 20A-CR-2121, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 28, 2021).
The Indiana Supreme Court explicitly established that, beginning on January 1, 2020, “the court should utilize the results of an evidence-based risk assessment approved by the Indiana Office of Court Services, and such other information as the court finds relevant.” Crim. R. 26(B). This requirement cannot be circumvented by simply choosing not to order the preparation of an evidence-based risk assessment.