• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Wright v. State, No. 49A04-0905-CR-259, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 10, 2009)

November 20, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

Dying stab victim’s response to question “who did this” from police officer trying to help staunch the wounds was not “testimonial” under Crawford doctrine and hence its admission did not violate defendant’s confrontation right.

Nunley v. State, No. 31A01-0902-CR-88, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 16, 2009)

November 20, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

Child’s statement did not have sufficient indicia of reliability to be admissible under the protected persons statute.

Davis v. State, No. 49A04-0907-CR-379, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 17, 2009)

November 20, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Darden, P. Mathias

When probationer admitted only his arrest for new offense but not of probable cause, and State did not present the probable cause affidavit or any other evidence of the new offense, revocation of probation violated probationer’s due process rights.

Koors v. Steffen, No. 57A03-0904-CV-167, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 6, 2009)

November 20, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

When contract provided for arbitration and also left a chance a lien could arise, the possibility the court would have to engage in foreclosure procedures depending on the arbitration outcome required the court to stay the litigation pending the arbitration, rather than dismissing the suit.

Miller v. Yedlowski, No. 49A02-0901-CV-78, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 10, 2009)

November 20, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

Party seeking a second extension of time to respond to summary judgment motion must do so prior to expiration of the period of the first extension.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 375
  • Go to page 376
  • Go to page 377
  • Go to page 378
  • Go to page 379
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 400
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs