• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Bandini v. Bandini, No. 49A04-1001-DR-26, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 8, 2010)

October 15, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb

“[A] military spouse may not, by a post-decree waiver of retirement pay in favor of disability benefits or CRSC [Combat Related Special Compensation], unilaterally and voluntarily reduce the benefits awarded the former spouse in a dissolution decree.”

Deere & Co. v. New Holland Rochester, Inc., No. 25A05-1006-CC-367, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 12, 2010)

October 15, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

Purchaser’s reliance on assurances of seller and bank that seller had satisfied liens on sale property was unreasonable and would not avoid the liens; purchaser had to contact lienholder directly.

State v. Lucas, No. 91A05-1003-CR-247, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 30, 2010)

October 7, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

Portable breath test mouthpiece is not a foreign substance which would invalid a subsequent Datamaster blood alcohol content test.

Long v. State, No. 41A04-0912-CR-743, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 30, 2010)

October 7, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam, J. Kirsch

Evidence raised sufficient inference that purchaser under lease-to-purchase contract never intended to pay, so that proof purchaser took furnishings when he moved out sufficed, with intent inference, to prove crime of theft.

Konopasek v. State, No. 25A03-1003-CR-155, __N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 30, 2010)

October 7, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

“[D]efendant’s acknowledgement he is on probation, without more,” does not “’open the door’ to extensive and potentially-damaging character evidence about the nature of his prior offenses or the length of his prior sentences.”

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 353
  • Go to page 354
  • Go to page 355
  • Go to page 356
  • Go to page 357
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 405
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs