When his paternity had not been established and no petition for participation had been filed, the juvenile court had no authority to order asserted father’s parental participation in CHINS services.
Appeals
Fisher v. Giddens, No. 48A02-1002-EU-197, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 21, 2010)
When limited partner bought annuity in the name of the limited partnership and then had it put in his own name for tax purposes, the annuity remained partnership property despite the name change.
Kennedy v. State, No. 89A04-0907-CR-380, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 6, 2010)
Defense attack on technical details of DNA testing went to the weight, not admissibility, of DNA identification evidence.
Morgan v. State, No. 49A04-1001-CR-43, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 13, 2010)
“[A] stipulation may be presented to the jury in the form of a preliminary instruction.”
R.R.F. v. L.L.F., No. 69A01-1001-DR-77, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 8, 2010)
When Mother would receive a $4,000 tax credit for her contributions to child’s college expenses, trial court erred under Support Guideline 8(b) in not giving Father a setoff against his share of the expenses to apportion the credit equitably.