• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

State ex rel. FSSA v. Est. of Roy, No. 33A04-1105-ES-24, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 28, 2012).

March 1, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Kirsch, M. Barnes

FSSA, a subdivision of the State, filed a valid lien against the property of a Medicaid recipient, had a preferred claim under Ind. Code 12-15-9-1, and was not required to file its claim within nine months of the death of the Medicaid recipient.

State v. Vickers, No. 88A05-1106-PC-317, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 21, 2012).

February 24, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

Fact that there was no record of defendant’s waiver of his right to counsel was not sufficient to meet his P-C.R. burden to prove his waiver was involuntary.

Yanez v. State, No. 49A02-1104-CR-362, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 21, 2012).

February 24, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, B. Barteau, M. Barnes

When officer who made the investigatory stop did not testify as to her reasons for making the stop and supporting officer’s testimony amounted only to “postulation” as for reasons for the initial stop, there was no showing that there was any constitutional basis for stopping the defendant.

In re Ind. Newspapers, Inc., No. 49A02-1103-PL-23, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 21, 2012).

February 23, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

Regarding whether a non-party news organization can be compelled to disclose in a defamation lawsuit the identity of an anonymous commenter, the Court of Appeals adopts a modified Dendrite test requiring the plaintiff to produce prima facie evidence to support only those elements of the cause of action that are not dependent on the commenter’s identity.

State v. Holtsclaw, No. 49A02-1108-CR-743, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 16, 2012).

February 17, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker, M. Bailey

State cannot appeal the denial of a motion to correct error, so that here motion to correct aimed at successful motion to suppress could not be appealed and appeal of suppression motion itself was untimely.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 310
  • Page 311
  • Page 312
  • Page 313
  • Page 314
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 407
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs