• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Barker v. State, No. 73A01-1212-CR-575, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 17, 2013).

September 27, 2013 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

“Whether home detention is imposed via a direct placement in a community corrections program or as a condition of probation, its accompanying statutory requirement that the detainee receive credit time militates toward counting it as part of the executed portion of his sentence.”

In re N.C.G., No. 02A04-1301-JP-21, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 19, 2013).

September 27, 2013 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

“[S]o long as a father pays child support, exercises parenting time, and actively participates in the child’s life, then the best interests of the child may be served by giving the child the father’s surname to reinforce the bond between father and his nonmarital child, particularly if father is the noncustodial parent.”

Lunsford v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas, No. 30A01-1302-MF-63, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 20, 2013).

September 27, 2013 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

The bank had the senior claim on a property even though a land contract between the owner and buyer had been executed years earlier because the contract wasn’t recorded until after the mortgage was recorded.

Rickman v. Rickman, No. 27A02-1211-DR-950, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 10, 2013).

September 12, 2013 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown

Imprisonment for child molestation and criminal confinement is insufficient, by itself, to deny an incarcerated father phone or mail contact with his child.

Luttrell v. Luttrell, No. 49A02-1301-DR-85, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 12, 2013).

September 12, 2013 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb

The trial court properly excluded a lump sum Social Security Disability Insurance payment from division as part of the marital estate.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 274
  • Go to page 275
  • Go to page 276
  • Go to page 277
  • Go to page 278
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 406
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs