Trial court did not violate defendant’s due-process rights by requiring her to testify by signing to an interpreter.
Appeals
Perry v. State, No. 39A01-1312-CR-517, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 22, 2014.)
Credit time for being in a drug court program with electronic monitoring is not required, but can be awarded in the court’s discretion.
Dixon v. State, No. 84A01-1307-CR-339, __ N.E.3d__ (Ind. Ct. App., July 22, 2014).
Terry pat-down search could not be conducted under the facts of the case.
Montgomery v. State, No. 82A05-1401-CR-34, __ n.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 23, 2014).
As statute requires a sex offender who moves to report to both the county he is leaving and the county he is moving to, defendant’s convictions for failing to register as a sex or violent offender in both counties were not barred either by statute or double jeopardy principles.
Willis v. State, No. 49A02-1310-CR-854, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 11, 2014).
Affirms criminal trespass conviction based on evidence defendant was seen running near the scene of the alleged crime not long after a security alarm was activated and voices and noises were heard inside the premises.