• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Littrell v. State, No. 79A02-1401-CR-24, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 21, 2014).

August 21, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

When defendant had moved for a trial within seventy days pursuant to Criminal Rule 4(B), the ninety day extension authorized by Criminal Rule 4(D) for unavailable state’s evidence ran from the end of the seventy day period, not from the earlier date when the trial court granted the extension.

Gonzalez v. Evans, No. 29A02-1311-DR-984. , __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 19, 2014).

August 21, 2014 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

Trial Rule 34(C)(3) permits non-parties to recover attorney fees associated with complying with a subpoena or other discovery request, but that refusing to comply with a discovery request solely on the basis that the parties cannot agree on an appropriate amount to pay does not constitute reasonable resistance to a discovery request.

Lucas v. State, No. 03A01-1309-CR-389, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 14, 2014).

August 14, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford, P. Riley

Officer’s taking expired license suspect into patrol car to “review the information and decide what we were going to do,” when review could have been conducted by the side of the suspect’s auto, impermissibly expanded scope of an investigatory stop without justification.

SCI Propane, LLC v. Frederick, No. 55A04-1211-PL-586, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 13, 2014).

August 14, 2014 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, R. Pyle

Defendants can recover attorney fees under the General Wrongful Death Statute.

State v. Downey, No. 10A01-1310-CR-432, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 31, 2014).

August 7, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford, M. Robb

Order for return of defendant’s money seized by police was abuse of discretion as the matter was moot because the money had already been transferred, by order of a different court without a hearing, to the federal government.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 256
  • Page 257
  • Page 258
  • Page 259
  • Page 260
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 408
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs