As statute requires a sex offender who moves to report to both the county he is leaving and the county he is moving to, defendant’s convictions for failing to register as a sex or violent offender in both counties were not barred either by statute or double jeopardy principles.
Appeals
Willis v. State, No. 49A02-1310-CR-854, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 11, 2014).
Affirms criminal trespass conviction based on evidence defendant was seen running near the scene of the alleged crime not long after a security alarm was activated and voices and noises were heard inside the premises.
Wright v. State, No. 45A05-1310-CR-526, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 11, 2014).
Removal of juror on basis he was refusing to deliberate was reversible error.
Belcher v. Kroczek, No. 45A03-1311-CT-436 , __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 9, 2014).
Reputation, privacy, and identity are not chattel under T.R. 75(A)(2).
Powell v. Powell, No. 88A01-1402-PL-59, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 3, 2014).
“[W]hen property is conveyed to individuals by the entirety or entireties, regardless of whether those individuals are husband and wife, a presumption arises that the grantor intended to convey the property with the right of survivorship.”