• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Gonzalez v. Evans, No. 29A02-1311-DR-984. , __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 19, 2014).

August 21, 2014 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

Trial Rule 34(C)(3) permits non-parties to recover attorney fees associated with complying with a subpoena or other discovery request, but that refusing to comply with a discovery request solely on the basis that the parties cannot agree on an appropriate amount to pay does not constitute reasonable resistance to a discovery request.

Lucas v. State, No. 03A01-1309-CR-389, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 14, 2014).

August 14, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford, P. Riley

Officer’s taking expired license suspect into patrol car to “review the information and decide what we were going to do,” when review could have been conducted by the side of the suspect’s auto, impermissibly expanded scope of an investigatory stop without justification.

SCI Propane, LLC v. Frederick, No. 55A04-1211-PL-586, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 13, 2014).

August 14, 2014 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, R. Pyle

Defendants can recover attorney fees under the General Wrongful Death Statute.

State v. Downey, No. 10A01-1310-CR-432, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 31, 2014).

August 7, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford, M. Robb

Order for return of defendant’s money seized by police was abuse of discretion as the matter was moot because the money had already been transferred, by order of a different court without a hearing, to the federal government.

Collins v. State, No. 49A02-1310-PC-887 , __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jul. 25, 2014).

July 31, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb

Denial of post-conviction relief petitioner’s request for subpoena for an out-of-state witness was not an abuse of discretion, when petitioner did not identify any state or federal law permitting the subpoena.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 254
  • Go to page 255
  • Go to page 256
  • Go to page 257
  • Go to page 258
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 406
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs