• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Shelton v. State, No. 71A03-1408-Cr-309, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 27, 2015).

March 5, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

Search of an offender on community corrections monitored home detention is subject to the reasonable suspicion standard required for probationer searches; in this case, the circumstances conferred the required reasonable suspicion for a warrantless dog sniff search of the offender’s home and garage.

Bisard v. State, No. 02A03-1312-CR-492, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 4, 2015).

March 5, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Friedlander

Trial court’s indication it would consider defendant’s use of certain evidence as opening the door to evidence of defendant’s subsequent criminal conduct was not a ruling admitting the subsequent conduct into evidence, so that defendant’s failure to present his evidence and obtain an actual ruling on an objection to the subsequent conduct evidence did not preserve the issue for appeal.

Ball Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Fair, No. 18A02-1405-CT-316, __N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., March 2, 2015).

March 5, 2015 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

Based on the principles of notice pleading, Plaintiff can pursue negligence claims against the hospital’s pharmacist despite not making the claim to the medical review panel.

Cartwright v. State, No. 65A01-1404-CR-170, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 25, 2015).

February 26, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Darden, J. Baker

Search warrant was erroneously issued, as the application did not establish the informant’s reliability, and the good faith exception could not save the search

Meridian North Investments v. Sondhi, No. 49A02-1405-PL-311, __N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 24, 2015).

February 26, 2015 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

Plaintiff is not personally bound by exculpatory provisions in lease with Defendant that Plaintiff signed on behalf of his corporation.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 242
  • Page 243
  • Page 244
  • Page 245
  • Page 246
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 408
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs