Trial court’s indication it would consider defendant’s use of certain evidence as opening the door to evidence of defendant’s subsequent criminal conduct was not a ruling admitting the subsequent conduct into evidence, so that defendant’s failure to present his evidence and obtain an actual ruling on an objection to the subsequent conduct evidence did not preserve the issue for appeal.
Appeals
Ball Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Fair, No. 18A02-1405-CT-316, __N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., March 2, 2015).
Based on the principles of notice pleading, Plaintiff can pursue negligence claims against the hospital’s pharmacist despite not making the claim to the medical review panel.
Cartwright v. State, No. 65A01-1404-CR-170, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 25, 2015).
Search warrant was erroneously issued, as the application did not establish the informant’s reliability, and the good faith exception could not save the search
Meridian North Investments v. Sondhi, No. 49A02-1405-PL-311, __N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 24, 2015).
Plaintiff is not personally bound by exculpatory provisions in lease with Defendant that Plaintiff signed on behalf of his corporation.
In re E.W., No. 40A04-1407-JC-349, __N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 25, 2015).
“By ordering that all contact between Mother and Child cease, the trial court is effectively ending that relationship until Child is a legal adult…Whether or not this is technically a final judgment, it certainly operates as one.”