• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Moore v. State, No. 49A05-1408-CR-398, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 22, 2015).

April 23, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey, M. Robb

Savings statute for the revised penal code did not prohibit application of the revised sentence modification statute, which does not require prosecutorial consent to a modification petition, to a petition to modify a crime committed and sentenced prior to the July 1, 2014 effective date of the modification statute’s revision.

M.M. v. State, No. 49A02-1409-JV-639, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 22, 2015).

April 23, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal, Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

A juvenile restitution order does not end on the juvenile’s discharge from probation, and action to collect the restitution may be taken after the probation ends.

J.B. v. State, No. 49A02-1409-JV-688, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 23, 2005).

April 23, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Sharpnack

Police officer’s temporary detention of juvenile on sidewalk to investigate whether item juvenile had discarded was a handgun was a reasonable action under the totality of the circumstances and did not violate the Indiana Constitution’s search protection in Article 1, Section 11.

Smith v. Foegley Landscape, Inc., No. 71A03-1405-SC-169, __N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 20, 2015).

April 23, 2015 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, R. Pyle

Submitting an affidavit for attorney’s fees that merely states that as a result of representation plaintiff incurred costs and legal expenses related to the litigation is not enough; the affidavit should contain information concerning the nature of services so the court can evaluate the reasonableness of the fees.

Babchuk v. Indiana University Health Tipton Hospital, Inc., No. 80A04-1409-PL-447, __N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 22, 2015).

April 23, 2015 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

It is the defendant’s burden to timely file a T.R. 41(E) motion to dismiss before the plaintiff resumes prosecution.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 236
  • Go to page 237
  • Go to page 238
  • Go to page 239
  • Go to page 240
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 407
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs