• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

In Re: The Matter of the Petition to Expunge Conviction Records of Borel, No. 92A05-1501-CR-26, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 30, 2015).

October 5, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, B. Barteau

Trial court erred in denying expungement of 1976 conviction for failure to pay court costs in that case. Typewritten docket entries did not indicate that any court costs were imposed, and partly-illegible handwritten notation on docket sheet was insufficient to show that costs had been imposed or remained unpaid.

Troyan v. Ind. Dept. of Revenue, No. 49A02-1411-PL-794, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App, Oct. 2, 2015).

October 5, 2015 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, R. Shepard

A circuit or superior court has jurisdiction to enforce an unpaid tax assessment reduced to judgment, but a claim involving a challenge to a collection of a tax or assessment was within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Indiana Tax Court.

Stockert v. State, No. 76A04-1504-CR-144, ___ N.E.3d ___, (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 22, 2015).

September 28, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown

By operation of law, defendant’s guilty plea to B-felony criminal deviate conduct rendered him SVP with lifetime registration; DOC therefore properly classified him as such, despite trial court’s erroneous statements that he was required to register for only ten years and was not an SVP.

Smith v. State, No. 24A01-1501-CR-1, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 22, 2015).

September 28, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

State-court restitution award to Ponzi scheme victims was improper; their losses resulted from defendant’s related federal crimes, for which restitution had already been ordered. Five counts of conducting business as a broker-dealer without registering constituted a “single episode of criminal conduct”; gravamen of the offense not the precise number of times defendant transacted business, but rather the initial failure to register, which is a grievance against the Secretary of State and did not directly harm the victims.

Pierce v. State, No. 28A05-1502-CR-57, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 23, 2015).

September 28, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

Petition to revoke probation based on commission of theft, unlike criminal charge of theft, need not identify the stolen property with specificity.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 210
  • Go to page 211
  • Go to page 212
  • Go to page 213
  • Go to page 214
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 400
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs