• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Jason Hansbrough v. State, No. 29A04-1508-CR-1121, ___ N.E.3d ___, (Ind. Ct. App. Jan. 29, 2016).

February 2, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

Dog sniff did not prolong Defendant’s traffic stop in violation of his constitutional rights.

Ronald L. Sanford, Jr. v. State, No. 49A05-1506-PC-485, ___ N.E.3d ___, (Ind. Ct. App. Jan. 29, 2016).

February 2, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

Trial court was within its discretion to find that defendant was not “diligent” in pursuing belated appeal under P-C.R. 2, which is exclusive means to reinstate untimely appeal in criminal cases; relief under In re Adoption of O.R. (Ind. 2014) is limited to civil cases.

Willie Moore v. State, No. 49A02-1505-CR-321, ___ N.E.3d ___, (Ind. Ct. App. Jan. 29, 2016).

February 2, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford, R. Pyle

Illinois residential burglary statute was “substantially similar” to Indiana burglary offense; despite not expressly containing a “breaking” element, Illinois caselaw infers such a requirement, and Illinois statute classifies it as a “forcible felony.”
Evidence was insufficient to support “bodily injury” element of resisting law enforcement as a Level 6 felony; fact that officer was injured while chasing defendant on foot established only contributing, not proximate, causation.

Kimberly Y. Morgan v. State, No. 34A05-1509-CR-1323, ___ N.E.3d ___, (Ind. Ct. App. Jan. 29, 2016).

February 2, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey

Amount of restitution awarded to embezzlement victim was abuse of discretion; award included sums an audit revealed were missing but were not shown to be connected to defendant’s conduct, and expenditures to determine the amount of loss.

Kevin T. Scripture, M.D. et al. v. Julia and Steven Roberts, No. 49A02-1504-CT-211, ___ N.E.3d ___, (Ind. Ct. App. Feb. 1, 2016).

February 2, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

Doctors’ conclusory affidavits failed to raise genuine issue of fact; affidavits merely restated the denials in their pleadings and did not cite facts to support that they met the standard of care or did not cause plaintiffs’ damages.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 206
  • Go to page 207
  • Go to page 208
  • Go to page 209
  • Go to page 210
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 407
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs