• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Cox v. State, No. 29A02-1508-PC-1221, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 29, 2016).

February 29, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, R. Pyle

Post-conviction court was required, upon indigent prisoner’s proper request, to forward petition to the State Public Defender’s Office for review. Failure to do so required reversal.

Gerth v. State, No. 29A02-1506-CR-693, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 18, 2016).

February 22, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

Search warrant was not based on probable cause, when supported only by two uncorroborated tips from informants with insufficiently established credibility and good-faith exception did not apply in view of officer’s “reckless material omission of fact” relevant to credibility of one of the tips.

Holloway v. State, No. 71A04-1508-CR-1292, ___ N.E.3d ___, (Ind. Ct. App. Feb. 18, 2016).

February 22, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey, T. Crone

Intoxicated, agitated arrestee’s statements to arresting officer were sufficient to establish “true threat” and thus to support intimidation conviction.

Lorenz v. Anonymous Physician #1, No. 28A01-1501-CT-50, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 19, 2016).

February 22, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb

Because the alleged negligence took place before plaintiff filed for bankruptcy, the cause of action was an asset of his bankruptcy estate and the bankruptcy trustee was the real party in interest for purposes of prosecuting the action. Plaintiff’s bankruptcy was reopened and the bankruptcy trustee was substituted as plaintiff on the proposed complaint.

In re Adoption of A.A., No. 48A02-1505-AD-328, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 19, 2016).

February 22, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey

The burden of proof on a petition to modify an existing order of grandparent visitation rights is on the petitioner to show the modification is in the best interests of the child.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 206
  • Page 207
  • Page 208
  • Page 209
  • Page 210
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 409
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs