• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Rhodes v. State, No. 49A02-1503-CR-173, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App. Jan. 19, 2016).

January 25, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes, M. May, T. Crone

Inventory search of defendant’s vehicle was unconstitutional, absent proof of existence of (or compliance with) established police procedures for such searches.

State v. Hancock, No. 39A05-1506-CR-633, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App. Jan. 22, 2016).

January 25, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

Elements of Ohio residential burglary offense were not “substantially similar” to Indiana offense, and therefore did not establish serious violent felon (SVF) status.

Rondeau v. State, No. 49A02-1505-PC-427, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App. Jan. 12, 2016).

January 15, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

Post-conviction court did not abuse its discretion in denying some requests for subpoenas, despite not issuing “a finding on the record” under P-C.R. 1(9)(b); subpoenas either were not specific enough to establish proposed witnesses’ relevance, or relevance was only to matters available at trial or on direct appeal.

In re Guardianship of Stant, No. 07A01-1504-GU-139, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 12, 2016).

January 15, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Kirsch

Ind. Code § 30-5-6-4, setting forth who may make a request and receive an accounting from an attorney in fact, applies to all power of attorneys (not just those created after the amendment of the statute on July 1, 2012).

Woods v. State, No. 20A03-1506-PC-688, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App. Dec. 29, 2015).

January 4, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam, M. May

Post-conviction court erred in finding that defendant received effective assistance of trial counsel; there was no serious dispute that counsel (now deceased) had failed prior to trial to communicate a guilty-plea offer that would have reduced defendant’s sentence exposure to about half of what he actually received.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 206
  • Go to page 207
  • Go to page 208
  • Go to page 209
  • Go to page 210
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 405
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs