Defendant’s probation was improperly revoked, because State failed to prove that the alleged violation occurred during the probationary period; Court of Appeals would not consider matters outside the record included in the State’s Appendix purporting to show the dates defendant was on probation.
Appeals
Pittman v. State, No. 49A05-1504-CR-137, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App. Nov. 5, 2015).
Attempted stalking, unlike the completed crime, does not require proof that the defendant’s conduct “actually causes the victim to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated, or threatened.”
Townsend v. State, No. 02A03-1503-CR-90, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App. Nov. 5, 2015).
Jury’s rejection of insanity defense was not contrary to law, when there was evidence that defendant’s mental state was due to voluntary intoxication rather than mental disease or defect.
Moore v. State, No. 29A02-1507-CR-866, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App. Nov. 6, 2015).
Evidence was sufficient to convict defendant of failure to register as a sex offender, even though he had moved to Kentucky and was no longer an Indiana resident, because as under I.C. § 11-8-8-17(a)(5) provides, he had knowingly ceased to reside at the Indiana address he had previously registered.
Powell v. State, No. 49A02-1503-CR-135, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App. Oct. 27, 2015).
Trespass conviction was reversed for insufficient evidence that the defendant was still on a bar’s property at the time he was told to leave.