• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Brown v. Lunsford, No. 82A04-1602-JP-357, __N.E.3d__ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 9, 2016).

November 15, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

The case granting visitation to a non-biological parent in a same sex relationship (A.C. v. N.J.) does not extend to other third-party requests for visitation.

Robertson v. Anonymous Clinic, No. 71A03-1512-CT-2199, __N.E.3d__ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 7, 2016).

November 7, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

Alleged negligence by a medical provider in selecting a certain drug from a particular supplier are claims subject to the Medical Malpractice Act.

Johnson v. State, No. 28A05-1602-CR-309, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 31, 2016).

October 31, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown

rial court abused its discretion in finding that defendant’s violation warranted serving the entirety of the remaining portion of his executed sentence in the DOC due to the level of his limited functioning and financial resources, his previous successful placement on work release, the nature of the violation, and the severity of the court’s sentence.

Price v. Ind. Dept. of Child Services, No. 49A05-1602-PL-380, __N.E.3d__ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 25, 2016).

October 31, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Kirsch, M. Robb, P. Riley

Plaintiff has no private case of action under Ind. Code. § 31-25-2-5 to enforce the maximum caseload standard against the Department of Child Services, but can proceed with her mandate action.

State v. Summers, No. 09A02-1604-MI-933, __N.E.3d__ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 19, 2016).

October 24, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

Applying the intent-effects test, no ex post facto violation occurred when defendant committed the underlying offense in Illinois before Indiana’s definition of sex offender had been amended to include an obligation to register as a sex offender.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 182
  • Go to page 183
  • Go to page 184
  • Go to page 185
  • Go to page 186
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 405
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs