Clerk, a garnishee defendant, is liable when she received a motion for proceedings supplemental to garnish the bond in an unrelated criminal case, and the clerk did not provide notice of the lien in the criminal case.
Appeals
S.S. v. State, No. 49A05-1605-JV-1070, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 17, 2017).
Even though juvenile defendant agreed to make restitution as part of the admission agreement, the juvenile court abused its discretion when it ordered him to pay restitution after it determined he did not have the ability to pay.
Taylor v. State, No. 32A05-1608-CR-1720, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 17, 2017).
Evidence obtained via a valid search warrant is admissible even though the arresting officer only had an electronic copy at the time of the search.
In re Grandparent Visitation of G.S., No. 30A01-1608-DR-1801, __N.E.3d__ (Ind. Ct. App, Jan. 17, 2016).
There is no statutory authority for a trial court to order a child to have visitation with relatives other than a grandparent in the face of a parent’s objections
Estate of Pfafman v. Lancaster, No. 57A03-1603-CC-516, __N.E.3d__ (Ind. Ct. App, Jan. 18, 2016).
The Comparative Fault Act does not require that a jury allocate some fault to every actor who proximately caused the plaintiff’s injury, but permits the allocation of any percentage or no percentage of fault to a party or nonparty who caused or contributed to cause the injury.