• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Hunter v. State, No. 43A03-1711-CR-2633, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 16, 2018).

May 21, 2018 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey

When defendant violates a condition of bail, the court may revoke bail, but may not impose a punitive contempt sanction unless defendant’s conduct affects the dignity or operation of the court.

Parsley v. MGA Family Group, Inc., No. 19A01-1707-CT-1535,__ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 16, 2018).

May 21, 2018 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Sharpnack

Grandmother, alleged de facto guardian of her grandson, could not bring an action on behalf of her grandson under the Child Wrongful Death Statute because she was not his legal guardian.

Yates v. Hites, No. 44A03-1710-CT-2459, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 18, 2018).

May 21, 2018 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey

The trial court abused its discretion when it gave the sudden emergency jury instruction with no evidence to support it. Because the sudden emergency instruction was given and emphasized in closing argument, a new trial is warranted.

Leatherman v. State, No. 47A04-1711-CR-2711, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 9, 2018).

May 14, 2018 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey

An individual participating in a needle exchange program may be found guilty of possession of paraphernalia if he intended to use syringes for unlawful ends; however, to sustain a conviction for maintaining a common nuisance for the unlawful delivery of a controlled substance from a vehicle, the State must show that it has been used on more than one occasion for that purpose.

Cosgray v. French Lick Resort & Casino, No. 59A01-1710-CT-2512 ,__ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 9, 2018).

May 14, 2018 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

Hotel did not owe plaintiff a duty to protect her from a criminal attack by an unknown assailant on their premises.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 135
  • Go to page 136
  • Go to page 137
  • Go to page 138
  • Go to page 139
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 400
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs