The term “conviction” includes a verdict of not responsible by reason of insanity (“NRRI”) for purposes of I.C. 35-38-9-1, and an individual so adjudicated may not have that finding expunged.
Appeals
Zartman v. Zartman, No. 18A-PL-1071, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 18, 2019).
When the content of a document is at issue in the context of a motion for summary judgment, it is for the court to decide based on the parties’ designated evidence.
Tutino v. Rohr-Indy Motors Inc., No. 18A-CT-2435, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 18, 2019).
Because the issues of fact were not material to the resolution of the case summary judgment was appropriate.
In re Name Change of M.E.B., No. 19A-MI-118, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 21, 2019).
AR 9 does not require that a transgender person requesting a name change provide evidence of violence occurring to that person because of gender identity or of violence being perpetrated against an Indiana resident who identifies as transgender.
In re Name Change of K.H., No. 18A-MI-3077, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 21, 2019).
The trial court improperly required that a person provide notice to the Attorney General of intent to waive publication and seal the record of a name change case pursuant to AR 9.