Children’s statements made to therapist regarding whether the children were aware that father killed their mother and whether they understood that they could visit Father were not admissible hearsay under the medical diagnosis exception because children likely did not understand that they were making statements to the therapist for the purpose of diagnosis or treatment.
Appeals
Robinson v. Robinson, No. 18A-EM-2742, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 13, 2019).
A transfer on death deed beneficiary “takes the owner’s interest in the property at the death of the owner subject to all conveyances . . . made by the owner . . . during the owner’s lifetime.” If the property owner quitclaims property interest prior to death, then there is no interest in the property to transfer upon death via the transfer on death deed.
Baca v. State, No. 18A-CR-2756, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 30, 2019).
A trial court’s grant of a directed verdict for the defendant under Trial Rule 50 acts as an acquittal on that count and bars the State from amending the charge and a retrial.
Howard v. State, No. 18A-CR-1830, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 30, 2019).
The trial court abused its discretion when it permitted the State to amend the information two business days before the start of the trial as it did not give defendant a reasonable opportunity to prepare for and defend against the new counts.
Cavanaugh’s Sports Bar & Eatery, Ltd. v. Porterfield, No. 18A-CT-1814, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 30, 2019).
Bar failed to establish as a matter of law that it did not owe patron a duty to protect him from criminal activity in its parking lot; the altercation occurred immediately after the Saturday night/Sunday morning crowd had been herded out of the bar at closing time and the bar had a history of reported incidents that gave it reason to contemplate further such incidents in its own parking lot.