• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Isom v. Neal, No. 21S-CQ-545, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Jan. 28, 2022).

January 31, 2022 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

A petition for post-conviction relief tendered to a trial court without the verification required by Post-Conviction Rule 1 is not properly filed.

State v. Katz, No. 20S-CR-632, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Jan. 18, 2022).

January 24, 2022 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: M. Massa, Supreme

Ind. Code § 35-45-4-8, which criminalizes the non-consensual distribution of an intimate image, does not violate the free interchange clause of the Indiana Constitution, or the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Duff v. Rockey, No. 21A-DR-1750, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 18, 2022).

January 24, 2022 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

An attorney who is disqualified from representing client in one matter is not automatically disqualified from representing client in another matter if the basis for disqualification no longer exists.

Wihebrink v. State, No. 20S-CR-632, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 24, 2022).

January 24, 2022 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam, N. Vaidik

An appeal waiver, despite a challenge to aggravators or mitigators found by the trial court at the time of sentencing, is enforceable because such a challenge is not one of illegality.

Ceres Solutions Coop., Inc. v. Estate of Bradley, No. 21A-CT-377, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 12, 2022).

January 18, 2022 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb

For the bystander rule for negligent infliction of emotional distress, explosion and subsequent fire are not separate injury-producing events for purposes of the temporal factor. Also, the plaintiff did not need to see the body of his wife being removed from the exploded house when he possessed a reasonable degree of certainty that she had been in the house at the time of the explosion.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 78
  • Go to page 79
  • Go to page 80
  • Go to page 81
  • Go to page 82
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 587
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs