Trial court did not violate parent’s due process rights by holding the termination of parental rights hearing via remote video hearing.
Bedtelyon v. State, No. 21A-CR-1952, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., March 4, 2022).
To prove that material is obscene, the State must demonstrate that the medium in which the conduct was viewed depicts or describes sexual conduct in a patently offensive manner.
Henry v. Community Healthcare Sys., No. 21A-CT-2150, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 15, 2022).
Invasion of privacy by intrusion into emotional seclusion or solace and invasion of privacy by public disclosure of private facts are not recognized torts in Indiana.
Bradbury v. State, No. 21S-PC-441, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Feb. 7, 2022).
Bradbury’s counsel did not render ineffective assistance by pursuing an all-or-nothing strategy.
Murray v. State, No. 21A-CR-1495__ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 11, 2022).
The Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination is not violated when a defendant is ordered to show their teeth to the jury because doing so is a non-testimonial physical demonstration.