• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Theobald v. State, No. 21A-CR-2746, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 30, 2022).

July 5, 2022 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

The “new-crime exception” to the Miranda exclusionary rule applies when a statement is made by a person who is subject to custodial interrogation but not given Miranda warnings. Under such circumstances, the statement is still admissible if the statement itself is evidence of a new crime.

Powers v. State, No. 21A-CR-1915, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 22, 2022).

June 27, 2022 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown

An officer must have reasonable suspicion of criminal activity in order to detain an individual beyond what is necessary to effectuate the purpose of the traffic stop.

Church v. State, No. 22S-CR-201, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 23, 2022).

June 27, 2022 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: C. Goff, M. Massa, Supreme

Ind. Code § 35-40-5-11.5, the child sex-offense deposition statute, is both constitutionally sound and substantive in nature, and therefore, the Indiana Trial Rules cannot abrogate or modify the statute.

State v. Neukam, No. 21S-CR-567, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 23, 2022).

June 27, 2022 Filed Under: Criminal, Juvenile Tagged With: C. Goff, G. Slaughter, M. Massa, Supreme

Slaughter, J. In 2020, we held juvenile courts lose jurisdiction once an alleged delinquent child reaches twenty-one years of age. But we left open the question whether the State can file criminal charges against a person who committed the charged conduct before turning eighteen but is no longer a child under the juvenile code. Under […]

Dunigan v. State, No. 21A-CT-2939, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 23, 2022).

June 27, 2022 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Tavitas

The trial court properly dismissed the complaint of an abusive litigant; the appellate court imposes sanctions on the litigant for his abuse of judicial resources.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 70
  • Go to page 71
  • Go to page 72
  • Go to page 73
  • Go to page 74
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 594
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs