Admission of government lab technicians’ sworn “certificates of analysis” that substance taken from defendant was cocaine violated defendant’s Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause right; the certificates were “affidavits” and within the “core class of testimonial statements” defined in Crawford v. Washington.
Washington Twp. Fire Dep't v. Beltway Surgery Ctr., No. 93A02-0811-EX-1006, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., June 24, 2009)
The employer of an injured employee bears the burden of proving that a medical service provider’s bill exceeds the Worker’s Compensation 80th percentile standard.
Smith v. Wrigley, No. 33A05-0903-CV-156, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., June 25, 2009)
Because inmate’s claims were neither legally nor factually frivolous, trial court erred in dismissing his complaint under the Frivolous Claim Law.
Breaston v. State, No. 20S04-0810-CR-561, __N.E.2d __ (Ind., June 16, 2009)
Rule that habitual offender portions of sentences cannot be consecutive applies even when mandatory consecutivity statute applies.
Farris v. State, No. 02S03-0904-PC-181, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., June 17, 2009)
Consecutive habitual offender sentences are not authorized when related charges are tried in separate causes.