• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Plummer v. Beard, No. 22A-CT-2559, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 4, 2023).

May 8, 2023 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

Community Health Network, Inc. v. McKenzie, 185 N.E.3d 368 (Ind. 2022), in which the Court held, in relevant part, that the public disclosure of private facts is a viable tort claim, applies retroactively.

Davis v. State, No. 22S-CR-253, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., May 3, 2023).

May 8, 2023 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: C. Goff, D. Molter, Supreme

If a defendant wishes to challenge their guilty plea, they cannot do so through a direct appeal; the issue of whether a defendant’s guilty plea was knowing and voluntary should instead be pursued by filing a petition for post-conviction relief.

Clark v. State, No. 22A-CR-2421, __N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 25, 2023).

May 1, 2023 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Tavitas

In the entrapment context, apparent agency does not depend on the principal’s express or implied authorization for the agent to act on the principal’s behalf; rather, apparent agency exists when a principal’s manifestations induce a third party to reasonably believe there is a principal-agent relationship.

Falletti v. State, No. 22A-IF-2421, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 28, 2023).

May 1, 2023 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb

Pursuant to Ind. Code § 36-8-12-11, volunteer firefighters may display blue lights in limited places on their vehicles visible to the public, but non-volunteer firefighters may not display blue lights visible to the public at all.

Evans v. State, No. 22A-PC-220, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 1, 2023).

May 1, 2023 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, R. Pyle

A habitual offender adjudication must be based on proof that a defendant has accumulated two prior unrelated felony convictions, meaning that the commission, conviction, and sentencing on the first felony preceded the commission, conviction, and sentence on the second felony. A post-conviction petitioner who challenges his habitual offender determination must demonstrate that he was not a habitual offender under the habitual offender statute and that his various convictions did not in fact occur in the required order.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 53
  • Go to page 54
  • Go to page 55
  • Go to page 56
  • Go to page 57
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 596
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs