• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. Tippecanoe Associates, LLC, No. 79A04-0906-CV-354, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 10, 2010)

March 12, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

Mortgage contract’s waiver of right of redemption was unenforceable, so that court’s having authorized foreclosure receiver to sell the property at a private sale without mortgagor’s consent erroneously deprived mortgagor of right of redemption.

Marshall v. Erie Insurance Exchange, No. 20A03-0908-CV-366, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 10, 2010)

March 12, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb

Holds that an urban or residential landowner has a duty of reasonable care to prevent an unreasonable risk of harm to neighbors arising from the condition of trees on the landowner’s property.

H.S. v. K.M.C., No. 62A01-0910-CV-493, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 11, 2010)

March 12, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey

When there had never been any custody determination made, the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act did not apply to mother’s Indiana petition to get child born out of wedlock back from father who had taken the child to another state.

King v. State, No. 49S04-0911-CR-507, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Mar. 2, 2010)

March 5, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: B. Dickson, Supreme

Holds that the crime of attempted dissemination of matter harmful to minors can be committed when the harmful matter is sent to a police officer posing as a minor.

Washington v. State, No. 49A02-0907-CR-649, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 4, 2010)

March 5, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Kirsch, M. May

Warrantless search of vehicle during infraction stop to find a handgun which driver admitted he had and for which he possessed a valid permit violated the Fourth Amendment when the officer lacked an articulable basis of concern for officer safety.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 546
  • Go to page 547
  • Go to page 548
  • Go to page 549
  • Go to page 550
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 593
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs