• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Murray v. City of Lawrenceburg, No. 15S04-0907-CV-310, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., Apr. 20, 2010)

April 23, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Supreme, T. Boehm

Inverse condemnation is the sole remedy for a governmental act that purports to exercise all rights of ownership over a parcel of land; the six year statute of limitations for trespass applies to such a claim.

Tisdial v. Young, No. 29A05-0909-CV-544, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Apr. 22, 2010)

April 23, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb

Indiana Code chapter 34-26-5 requires evidence of domestic violence, stalking, or a sex offense.

Lehman v. State, No. 35A05-0909-CR-513, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Apr. 13, 2010)

April 20, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

Confidential informant’s taped statements as to what occurred in controlled buy were hearsay and were inadmissible as well under the Crawford Confrontation Clause rule; informant’s statements during the buy were not admitted for the truth of their content and hence were not hearsay.

Shepherd v. State, No. 70A01-0908-PC-388, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Apr. 14, 2010)

April 20, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

Defense counsel’s representation of key prosecution witness on unrelated pending charges created a prima facie case of actual conflict and resulted in counsel’s failure to cross-examine the witness on the charges, resulting in ineffective assistance.

Shotts v. State, No. 71S03-0905-CR-253, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Apr. 15, 2010)

April 20, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: F. Sullivan, Supreme, T. Boehm

Suppression of evidence found during Indiana warrantless extradition arrest erroneously focused on flaws in Alabama magistrate’s probable cause determination, when correct inquiry was whether Indiana officers’ reliance on the report of Alabama warrant was reasonable.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 543
  • Go to page 544
  • Go to page 545
  • Go to page 546
  • Go to page 547
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 596
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs