• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Performance Service, Inc. v. Randolph Eastern School Corp., No. 23S-CP-59, __N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 28, 2023).

July 3, 2023 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

School corporation’s contract was void because the school corporation exceeded its authority by investing money in a project to earn a financial return.

Harris v. State, No. 23S-CR-165, __N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 29, 2023).

July 3, 2023 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: C. Goff, D. Molter, G. Slaughter, L. Rush

The jury in a habitual offender proceeding must be allowed to make the ultimate legal determination of whether the defendant has the status of habitual offender. Only evidence of the defendant’s alleged convictions is relevant to that determination. A defendant has no constitutional right to present irrelevant evidence.

Miller v. Patel, No. 22S-CT-371, __N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 29, 2023).

July 3, 2023 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: L. Rush, M. Massa, Supreme

Convictions entered after a guilty plea have the same preclusive effect in subsequent litigation as those entered after jury or court verdicts.

Med. Licensing Bd. of Ind. v. Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, No. 22S‐PL‐338, __N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 30, 2023).

July 3, 2023 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, D. Molter, G. Slaughter, Supreme

Abortion providers have standing to contest the constitutionality of Senate Bill 1 (2022) because the statute criminalizes their work, and so they face the sort of imminent, direct, personal injury. Indiana Constitution’s Article 1, Section 1 protects a woman’s right to an abortion that is necessary to protect her life or to protect her from a serious health risk, but the General Assembly retains broad legislative discretion for determining whether and the extent to which to prohibit abortions. The Court reversed the trial court’s preliminary injunction.

In re Adoption of S.L., No. 23S-AD-00158, __N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 20, 2023).

June 26, 2023 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: M. Massa, Supreme

The court had no appellate jurisdiction because the trial court’s order was not a final judgment; it neither disposed of all claims for all parties, nor stated there was no just reason for delay.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 47
  • Go to page 48
  • Go to page 49
  • Go to page 50
  • Go to page 51
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 594
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs