• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

M & M Investment Group, LLC v. Ahlemeyer Farms, Inc., No. 03A04-1112-CC-639, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., July 16, 2012).

July 19, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Kirsch

“We therefore conclude that the Indiana pre-tax sale notice statute violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because it does not require the government to provide sufficient notice prior to the tax sale either by mail or by personal service to mortgagees who have publicly recorded mortgages, even if such notice is not requested by the mortgagees, and because it provides that, even if the government fails to mail the requested notice or the notice is undeliverable for some reason, the validity of the tax sale will not be affected.”

Hollin v. State, No. 69S05-1201-PC-6, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., July 12, 2012).

July 13, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: R. Rucker, Supreme

Affirms trial court holding that state’s failure to disclose favorable plea bargain given to accomplice who testified against defendant violated the Brady v. Maryland obligation to disclose favorable evidence.

McWhorter v. State, No. 33A01-1202-PC-72, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 12, 2012).

July 13, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey

Instructions “prescribed sequential error.”

Stutz v. State, No. 49A02-1110-CR-960, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 5, 2012).

July 5, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Darden

“[C]lass A misdemeanor operating a vehicle with a BAC of at least .15 percent is not a lesser included offense of class C misdemeanor operating while intoxicated.”

T.B. v. Ind. Dept. of Child Svcs., No. 79A04-1110-JT-594, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., June 29, 2012).

July 5, 2012 Filed Under: Civil, Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

The Court declined to adopt a policy that prohibits the involuntary termination of parental rights for all mentally retarded parents.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 440
  • Go to page 441
  • Go to page 442
  • Go to page 443
  • Go to page 444
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 589
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs