• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Wilson v. State, No. 29A02-1202-CR-88, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 6, 2012).

September 10, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey

Trial court did not abuse discretion by excluding evidence of Department of Toxicology Laboratory audits of tests performed from 2007 t0 2009, on the basis that defendant’s test was performed in 2011 when “different procedures were executed by different analysts serving under a different Director more than 1 ½ years beyond the chronological scope of the audits.”

Dowell v. State, No. 09A05-1201-CR-36, __ N.E.2d__ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 27, 2012).

August 31, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

Jury Rules’ “leeway” for assisting a deliberating jury does not permit giving a supplemental instruction on accomplice liability by means of a note to jurors, instead of rereading all instructions in open court.

F.D. v. Ind. Dept of Family Svcs., No. 82A01-1109-CT-432, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 30, 2012).

August 31, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik, T. Crone

There is no private right of action for failure to report child abuse under Ind. Code § 31-33-18-4.

Bean v. State, No. 91A02-1109-CR-906, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 22, 2012).

August 23, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

Among factors leading to conclusion there was Miranda custody was the giving of Miranda rights, defendant’s invocation of those rights, and police failure to comply with them, notwithstanding continued police assurances during lengthy questioning that defendant was free to leave whenever he wished.

Iltzsch v. State, No. 49A02-1112-CR-1164, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 14, 2012).

August 17, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey, P. Mathias

Reverses restitution order because it rested solely upon victim’s unsupported assertions of loss as related to probation officer and placed in PSI, and holds State may not have a new restitution hearing to present evidence sufficient to support a restitution award.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 435
  • Go to page 436
  • Go to page 437
  • Go to page 438
  • Go to page 439
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 589
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs