• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Lopez v. State, No. 15A01-1212-CR-550, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Apr. 8, 2013).

April 12, 2013 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

When the State had seized considerable sums from defendant’s safe deposit boxes, the adverse effect flight would have on his ability to recover the money was a factor the court should have given some weight to in setting bail.

State Farm Fire & Cas., Co. v. Radcliff, No. 29A04-1111-CT-571, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Apr. 11, 2013).

April 12, 2013 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

Affirms the jury’s $14.5 million verdict on the defendant’s defamation counterclaim.

Meredith v. Pence, No. 49S00-1203-PL-172,___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., March 26, 2013).

March 28, 2013 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: B. Dickson, Supreme

“[T]he Indiana school voucher program, the Choice Scholarship Program, is within the legislature’s power under Article 8, Section 1, and that the enacted program does not violate either Section 4 or Section 6 of Article 1 of the Indiana Constitution.

Florida v. Jardines, No. 11–564, __ U.S. __ (Mar. 26, 2013).

March 27, 2013 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: A. Scalia, SCOTUS

Police using a drug dog at a home’s front door was a Fourth Amendment search.

Lagrone v State, No. 49A05-1203-CR-135, __ U.S. __ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 26, 2013).

March 27, 2013 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

Police placement of a GPS device in a package opened by UPS did not violate the Fourth Amendment, but police use of a “parcel wire” to monitor the opening of the package once defendant had taken it into his home was an illegal search under the Fourth Amendment; police could not enter the home without a warrant under the “exigent circumstances” exception because the exigent circumstances – the wire’s alert that the package was opening – were the result of their Fourth Amendment violation.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 421
  • Go to page 422
  • Go to page 423
  • Go to page 424
  • Go to page 425
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 596
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs