• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Griffin v. State, No. 49A02-1212-CR-964, __ N.E.2d_ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 23, 2013).

October 24, 2013 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey, P. Mathias, R. Shepard

When there is no indication of possible criminal activity, a citizen who walks away after a police officer orders him to stop does not commit the crime of resisting arrest by departing.
“[I]n the absence of statutory authority, a court may not impose community service in lieu of costs and fees.”

McGee v. McGee, No. 45A04-1301-DR-33, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 24, 2013).

October 24, 2013 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

A guardian cannot file a petition for dissolution of marriage on behalf of his or her ward.

Ott v. State, No. 20A05-1306-CR-270, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 16, 2013).

October 17, 2013 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown

Statute conferring discretion on court to convert a D felony to an A misdemeanor does not include convictions for offenses committed prior to July 1, 1977, when D felony classification became effective.

Ferguson v. O’Brien, No. 49A02-1211-CT-917, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 15, 2013).

October 17, 2013 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Friedlander, T. Crone

The drafter of a will owes a fiduciary duty to intended beneficiaries even though he may not have known their names when he drafted the will.

Estate of Mayer v. Lax, Inc., No. 37A03-1207-PL-323, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 7, 2013).

October 10, 2013 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

-Termination of a cause of action against an alleged agent-tortfeasor because of death does not require termination of a cause of action against the agent’s principal.
-Punitive damages should not be imposed against a corporation strictly on the basis of respondeat superior for an employee’s misconduct; there must be evidence of positive or collusive action by the employer.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 408
  • Page 409
  • Page 410
  • Page 411
  • Page 412
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 602
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs