• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Johnson v. State, No. 49A02-1301-CR-28, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 20, 2013).

August 22, 2013 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

Rejects arguments that traffic stop, based on officer’s belief vehicle was in violation of the Window Tint Statute, was illegal under the Indiana Constitution or violated an implicit prohibition in the Statute itself of “unbridled discretion” for police to pull over vehicles with window tint.

Walls v. State, No. 55A05-1211-CR-603, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 22, 2013).

August 22, 2013 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown, P. Riley

Tenants had a sufficient possessory interest in their apartment doors and thresholds and the immediate adjacent areas to request, for criminal trespass purposes, that a person leave those areas and stop banging on their doors.

In Re Adoption of C.B.M. & C.R.M, No. 37S03-1303-AD-159, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Aug. 16, 2013).

August 22, 2013 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

The adoption of two children was voidable under T.R. 60(B)(7) when the natural mother’s termination of parental rights was reversed on appeal.

In Re A.H. & S.H., No. 10A01-1302-JM-93, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 21, 2013).

August 22, 2013 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown, P. Riley

Department of Child Services interviewing a child as part of the initial assessment in response to a report of child abuse or neglect does not violate due process.

Toradze v. Toradze, No. 71A05-1212-DR-623, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 22, 2013).

August 22, 2013 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown, P. Riley

“Because the trial court had established a duty to support the children in a court order issued prior to July 1, 2012 and the children were younger than twenty-one years of age, Mother was entitled to file her petition for post-educational expenses based on I.C. § 31-16-6-6(a) & (c).”

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 399
  • Go to page 400
  • Go to page 401
  • Go to page 402
  • Go to page 403
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 587
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs