• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Steele-Giri v. Steele, No. 45S04-1512-DR-00682, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 15, 2016).

March 21, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

Because of the highly deferential standard of review afforded to trial courts in family law matters and in contempt matters, although the evidence might have supported motion for custody modification, such modification was not required.

Grayson v. State, No. 49A05-1505-CR-350, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., March 8, 2016).

March 14, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

Anonymous tip of individual in silver or gray car waving a gun in apartment parking lot provided reasonable suspicion for investigatory stop of defendant, who was in the only occupied silver car in the parking lot; officer’s observations then gave probable cause for search.

Marshall v. State, No. 20A03-1507-MI-973, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., March 9, 2016).

March 14, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: M. Barnes

Expungement was properly denied when, despite having no new convictions, petitioner had admitted in a pretrial diversion program to committing a new crime.

Lowden v. State, No. 49A02-1503-CR-170, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., March 10, 2016).

March 14, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

For purposes of aggravated battery, “substantial risk of death or … protracted loss or impairment of the function of a bodily member or organ” is not a material element of the offense, but rather a result to which mens rea is inapplicable.

Williams v. State, No. 29A02-1506-CR-528, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., March 10, 2016).

March 14, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Darden

Defendant entered an “open plea,” despite plea agreement’s mistaken recitation that it was not, because trial court retained discretion over placement of the sentence. Defendant therefore did not waive right to appeal sentence.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 283
  • Go to page 284
  • Go to page 285
  • Go to page 286
  • Go to page 287
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 587
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs