• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Kerwood v. Elkhart Co. Sheriff’s Dept., No. 23A-PL-2229, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Apr. 10, 2024).

April 15, 2024 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown

Ind. Code § 35-38-9-10(f) sets forth mechanisms to enforce expungement provisions; no private right of action exists for failure to properly expunge or seal records after an expungement order is issued.

Dunn v. State, No. 24S-CR-123, __N.E.3d __ (Ind., Apr. 10, 2024).

April 15, 2024 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: C. Goff, Supreme

Courts should take great caution in using the phrase “and/or,” especially in jury instructions, because it is ambiguous and potentially imprecise. Where wording permits two contradictory interpretations, one correct and one erroneous, the jury may be misled as to the law.

G.W. v. State, No. 23S-JV-246, __N.E.3d __ (Ind., Apr. 10, 2024).

April 15, 2024 Filed Under: Criminal, Juvenile Tagged With: C. Goff, G. Slaughter, Supreme

When a juvenile court fails to enter the requisite findings of fact in its dispositional order, an appellate court should neither affirm nor reverse. Instead, the proper remedy is to remand the case under Ind. App. R. 66(C)(8) while holding the appeal in abeyance.

Safeco Ins. Co. v. Blue Sky Innovation Group, Inc., No. 23S-CT-272, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Apr. 2, 2024).

April 9, 2024 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: M. Massa, Supreme

Trial court properly dismissed a third-party spoliation claim when there was no special relationship between the parties to create a duty to preserve the evidence.

Individual Members of the Medical Licensing Bd. of Ind.. v. Anonymous Plaintiff 1, No. 22A-PL-2938, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Apr. 4, 2024).

April 9, 2024 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, L. Weissmann, M. Bailey

Recognizes the doctrine of associational standing and affirms the trial court’s finding that plaintiffs are entitled to a preliminary injunction regarding the abortion law, but remands for a more narrowly tailored injunction.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 26
  • Go to page 27
  • Go to page 28
  • Go to page 29
  • Go to page 30
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 593
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs