To trigger the 180-day statute of limitations extension for a medical malpractice action, the plaintiff must show that she has subsequently acquired knowledge of or received information about something she did not previously know with regard to her injury and $15,000 is insufficient to compensate her for that more serious injury.
Ind. Bureau of Motor Vehicles v. Watson, No. 45A03-1607-MI-1538, __N.E.3d__ (Ind. Ct. App, Jan. 23, 2016).
Although labeled otherwise, plaintiff’s Motion to Issue a Valid Driver’s License Credential effectively asked the trial court to engage in judicial review of an agency action and plaintiff was required to comply with the Indiana Administrative Orders and Procedures Act.
Skipworth v. State, No. 49A02-1605-CR-973, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 10, 2017).
Trial court has authority to order defendant to complete domestic violence counseling even though he was not convicted of domestic battery when it is reasonably related to the crime.
Tyms-Bey v. State, No. 49A05-1603-CR-439, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 13, 2017).
Indiana’s RFRA offers no protection for the allegedly criminal nonpayment of income taxes, and the trial court did not err by denying a request to assert the defense.
Watkins v. State, No. 82A01-1510-CR-1624, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 6, 2017).
Under the totality of the circumstances, the extent of law enforcement’s need for a “military-style assault” was low and the degree of intrusion was unreasonably high; the search violated defendant’s right to be secure against an unreasonable search and seizure.