• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Weaver v. State, No. 32S04-1608-CR-415, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Aug. 4, 2016).

August 8, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

Driver who was unable to produce his driver’s license, avoided answering request for his address, evaded questions about his name, and repeatedly refused to provide his date of birth, was guilty of violating refusal-to-identify statute at Ind. Code § 34-28-5-3.5.

Hubbell v. State, No. 03A01-1511-PC-1927, ___N.E.3d___ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 5, 2016).

August 8, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown

Trial court is required to order copy of Record of Proceedings from Supreme Court Clerk when requested by pro se petitioner for post-conviction relief.

Woodford v. State, No. 20A03-1601-CR-171, ___N.E.3d___ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 5, 2016).

August 8, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey

The trial court has authority to reduce or suspend a prior sentence and impose a new sentence that the court was authorized to impose at the time of sentencing under Ind. Code § 35-38-1-17.

Montgomery v. State, No. 02A04-1511-CR-2013,__N.E.3d__ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 5, 2016).

August 8, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

Placement on probation and placement in a community transition program are not one and the same, and the court’s consideration of those options is not mutually exclusive; therefore, the trial court’s revocation of probation was not barred by res judicata.

Shelton v. Kroger LP I, No. 49A02-1601-CT-75, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 4, 2016).

August 8, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

Pharmacy that filled a prescription for a drug that caused a fatal interaction was not a qualified health care provider under the Medical Malpractice Act and so it was not exempted from the Comparative Fault Act.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 263
  • Go to page 264
  • Go to page 265
  • Go to page 266
  • Go to page 267
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 587
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs