• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

AAA Federal Credit Union v. Ind. Dept. of Transportation, No. 71A03-1609-PL-2091, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 7, 2017).

July 10, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

In an inverse condemnation case, landowner does not have a property interest in the free flow of traffic from a particular road or in continuing to abut a particular type of road.

Shinnock v. State, No. 18S05-1706-CR-429, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 27, 2017).

June 30, 2017 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

Independent, circumstantial evidence that was the crime was committee was sufficient for corpus delicti evidence required to have a confession admitted.

Whiteside v. State, No. 02S05-1706-CR-441, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 29, 2017).

June 30, 2017 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

Juvenile waived into adult court and convicted of Class B felony attempted rape and two counts of Class B felony criminal deviate conduct was properly sentenced to an aggregate sentence of sixty years imprisonment.

Jacobs v. State, No. 49S02-1706-CR-438 , __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 29, 2017).

June 30, 2017 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: M. Massa, Supreme

State has the burden to demonstrate the reasonableness of a warrantless search in light of three factors: 1) the degree of concern, suspicion, or knowledge that a violation has occurred, 2) the degree of intrusion the method of the search or seizure imposes on a citizen’s ordinary activities, and 3) the extent of law enforcement needs.

In re Civil Commitment of M.L., No. 49A02-1612-MH-2823, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 27, 2017).

June 30, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford, P. Riley

A special condition of a mental health commitment must bear a relationship to treatment or protection of the public; special condition of no alcohol or drug use was struck because there was no record of this relationship.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 237
  • Go to page 238
  • Go to page 239
  • Go to page 240
  • Go to page 241
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 596
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs