Trial court did not remedy defendant’s double jeopardy concern when it entered a judgment of conviction for the offense and its lesser-included offense (Class A misdemeanor OWI and Class C misdemeanor
OwI) and then merged the offenses purposes of sentencing.
KS & E Sports v. Runnels, No. 32S01-1704-PC-226, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 24, 2017).
A firearms seller is immune from a damages suit for injuries caused by another person’s misuse of a firearm, but the seller is not immune from a public nuisance claim seeking equitable relief.
Ryan v. TCI Architects/Engineers/Contractors, Inc., No. 49S02-1704-CT-253, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 26, 2017).
By entering into a contract containing language that required general contractor to assume responsibility for implementing and monitoring safety precautions and programs for all individuals working on the site, and by agreeing to designate a safety representative to supervise such implementation and monitoring, the general contractor affirmatively demonstrated an intent to assume a nondelegable duty of care toward the subcontractor.
Johnson v. State, No. 32A05-1604-CR-703, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 19, 2017).
Under legislation amended in 2015, if the offender was released more than ten years before the current offense the conviction does not count for habitual offender purposes.
Burnett v. State, No. 49A02-1610-CR-2402, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 19, 2017).
The trial court, not the probation department, has the discretion to impose probation fees, and must conduct an indigency hearing before doing so.