• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

In re Adoption and Paternity of K.A.W., No. 31A01-1712-AD-2797 ,__ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 20, 2018).

April 23, 2018 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

Although Putative Father registered as a putative father and filed a petition to establish paternity, Putative Father’s consent to adoption was irrevocably implied because he failed to register as a putative father in a timely fashion.

Poortenga v. State, No. 45A03-1709-CR-2148, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 10, 2018).

April 16, 2018 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

Evidence of an individual’s alcohol concentrate equivalent is relevant to the question of whether an individual was intoxicated, regardless of whether the individual’s alcohol concentrate equivalent was more or less than 0.08.

Wirthlin v. State, No. 24A01-1711-CR-2662, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 11, 2018).

April 16, 2018 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

Defendant’s signing of documents that include a waiver of counsel do not fulfill the trial court’s responsibility to ensure a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary waiver.

Weida v. State, No. 79S02-1711-CR-00687, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 12, 2018).

April 16, 2018 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: C. Goff, Supreme

The prior version of Sex Offender Special Condition 26, providing a ban on using the internet, is unreasonable since it does not reasonably relate to probationer’s rehabilitation and protecting the public.

Roumbos v. Vazanellis, No. 45S03-1710-CT-635,__ N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 12, 2018).

April 16, 2018 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: G. Slaughter, Supreme

In a legal malpractice case, defendants failed to establish, as a matter of law, that plaintiff would not have succeeded in her underlying premises-liability claim; it is a material-factual dispute that the designated evidence establishes that various wires on a hospital-room floor and the risks they pose would be apparent to a reasonable person.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 199
  • Go to page 200
  • Go to page 201
  • Go to page 202
  • Go to page 203
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 587
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs