Misuse serves as a complete bar to recovery in a products liability action because of the inclusion of comparative fault principles in the Indiana Products Liability Act.
Gittings v. Deal, No. 18S-TR-231, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Nov. 2, 2018).
Trust claims are subject to statutes of limitations to the extent they seek affirmative relief, but do not prevent the request for court approval of the property transfers.
Ind. University Health So. Ind. Physicians, Inc. v. Noel, No. 18A-CT-1299, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 7, 2018).
Venue statute, Ind. Code § 23-0.5-4-12, conflicts with Trial Rule 75, so the statute is void.
In re Guardianship of Luis, No. 18A-GU-1312, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 8, 2018).
A trial court is required to make findings on special immigrant juvenile status in accordance with 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(27)(J).
Daniels v. FanDuel, Inc., No. 18S-CQ-00134, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Oct. 24, 2018).
“Indiana’s right of publicity statute contains an exception for material with newsworthy value that includes online fantasy sports operators’ use of college players’ names, pictures, and statistics for online fantasy contests.”