A plaintiff‐debtor’s omission of a lawsuit from their bankruptcy asset schedule does not deprive them of standing to pursue that lawsuit. Judicial estoppel does not bar the claim if the bankruptcy court permits the plaintiff‐debtor to cure their omission by amending their asset schedule.
Salmon v. Tafelski, No. 23A-CT-2173, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 17, 2024).
Where a remedy is available and adequate under the probate code, the heir of a decedent who died intestate does not have the authority to maintain an independent claim for tortious interference with an inheritance outside the probate estate.
Cosme v. Clark, No. 24S-CT-159, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., May 6, 2024).
At the directed-verdict stage, a judge can review whether inferences from the evidence are reasonable, but it cannot weigh conflicting evidence or assess witness credibility.
Campbell v. Campbell, No. 23A-CT-2178, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 8, 2024).
While domestic violence is of general public interest, where the allegations concern private conduct by private individuals and attract no public interest on their own, the anti-SLAPP defense for a defamation claim does not apply.
Bojko v. Anonymous Physician, No. 23S-CT-343, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., May 9, 2024).
Trial courts have no authority to redact or otherwise exclude the evidence a party submits to a medical review panel.