• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Gary v. State, No. 18A-CR-2067, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 9, 2019).

May 13, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

Because some or all of the evidence could be used to prove defendant committed both felony intimidation and attempted murder, the conviction of intimidation is vacated as it violates his right against double jeopardy under the actual evidence test.

In re Termination of Parent-Child Relationship of S.K., No. 18A-JT-2200, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 13, 2019).

May 13, 2019 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

Children’s statements made to therapist regarding whether the children were aware that father killed their mother and whether they understood that they could visit Father were not admissible hearsay under the medical diagnosis exception because children likely did not understand that they were making statements to the therapist for the purpose of diagnosis or treatment.

Robinson v. Robinson, No. 18A-EM-2742, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 13, 2019).

May 13, 2019 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam, J. Baker

A transfer on death deed beneficiary “takes the owner’s interest in the property at the death of the owner subject to all conveyances . . . made by the owner . . . during the owner’s lifetime.” If the property owner quitclaims property interest prior to death, then there is no interest in the property to transfer upon death via the transfer on death deed.

Baca v. State, No. 18A-CR-2756, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 30, 2019).

May 6, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

A trial court’s grant of a directed verdict for the defendant under Trial Rule 50 acts as an acquittal on that count and bars the State from amending the charge and a retrial.

Howard v. State, No. 18A-CR-1830, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 30, 2019).

May 6, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam, R. Altice

The trial court abused its discretion when it permitted the State to amend the information two business days before the start of the trial as it did not give defendant a reasonable opportunity to prepare for and defend against the new counts.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 160
  • Go to page 161
  • Go to page 162
  • Go to page 163
  • Go to page 164
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 586
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs