Under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, husband’s equitable interest in property did not entitle him to the half of the proceeds from the sale of property; a defrauded creditor is entitled to the full value of the fraudulently transferred property at the time of the transfer.
Tunstall v. Manning, No. 19S-CT-18, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 26, 2019).
An expert witness’s professional-licensure status and the reasons for professional discipline may be admissible to challenge the expert’s credibility.
IBM v. State, No. 49D01-1005-PL-21451, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 26, 2019).
Under Ind. Code § 34-13-1-6, post-judgment interest runs from the judgment on remand.
In re Eq.W., No. 18S-JC-603, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 27, 2019).
The claim preclusion branch of res judicata applies to CHINS proceedings; if the State wishes to refile after a CHINS petition is dismissed, it must show that the new CHINS petition contains allegations of material fact that could not have been included in the dismissed action.
Morrison v. Vasquez, No. 19S-CT-382, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 27, 2019).
A domestic organization’s actual principal office and not the location of its registered agent is the appropriate preferred venue.