• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Juvenile

D.C. v. State, No. 49S02-1102-JV-116, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Nov. 17, 2011).

November 18, 2011 Filed Under: Juvenile Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

Delinquency disposition statutes do not permit imposition of both a determinate DOC commitment and an indeterminate DOC commitment.

In re C.G., No. 49S04-1101-JT-4, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., Oct. 11, 2011).

October 13, 2011 Filed Under: Juvenile Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

Adopts the factors set out in State of West Virginia ex rel. Jaenette H., 529 S.E.2d at 877 (W.Va. 2000) for trial courts to determine whether an incarcerated parent is permitted to attend a hearing on the termination of his or her parental rights.

P.J. v. State, No. 49A05-1102-JV-121, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 5, 2011).

October 7, 2011 Filed Under: Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, C. Darden

A juvenile who enters into a plea agreement to pay a specific amount of restitution waives his right to have the juvenile court inquire into his ability to pay, as he has acknowledges such ability in his plea agreement.

G.N. v. IDCS (In re T.N.), No. 49A05-1101-JC-15, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 28, 2011).

September 29, 2011 Filed Under: Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

One parent’s admission is insufficient to prove a child is a CHINS when the child’s other parent contests that allegation; due process requires a fact-finding hearing before the court declares the child is a CHINS.

C.S. v. State, No. 67A01-1101-JS-19, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 17, 2011).

August 19, 2011 Filed Under: Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, J. Kirsch

Evidence that child skipped one day of school, missed part of five classes, was tardy twelve times and that his mother had cooperated with school and disciplined him did not suffice to raise the required status delinquency inference he was not receiving care, treatment, or rehabilitation.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 19
  • Go to page 20
  • Go to page 21
  • Go to page 22
  • Go to page 23
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 25
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs