• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Juvenile

D.Y. v. State, No. 49A02-1405-JV-298, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 11, 2015).

March 12, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal, Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, R. Pyle

When officer told juvenile he would be transported to the police station, the juvenile was “seized” for purposes of the Fourth Amendment, and as the office had no probable cause to believe the juvenile had committed a crime the firearm the officer found in patting the juvenile down was inadmissible.

C.L. v. State, No. 05A04-1306-JV-319, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 30, 2014).

January 30, 2014 Filed Under: Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam, J. Baker

Reverses delinquency adjudication for intimidation because child’s threats were all conditional about speculative or future events, not past conduct.

N. L. v. State, No. 47S01-1302-JV-126, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., July 1, 2013).

July 3, 2013 Filed Under: Juvenile Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

To order a delinquent child to register as a sex offender, the juvenile court must first hold an evidentiary hearing and “expressly” find “by clear and convincing evidence that the juvenile is likely to commit another sex offense.”

In re Adoption of J.T.A., No. 37A03-1212-AD-525, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 10, 2013).

June 17, 2013 Filed Under: Civil, Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb

When the child’s father and the father’s fiancée were not married at the time of the adoption hearing, if the child’s adoption was granted to the father’s fiancé, then it would sever the mother’s parental rights but not the father’s.

C. B. v. State, No. 49A04-1207-JV-379, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 21, 2013).

May 23, 2013 Filed Under: Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker, M. Barnes

Juvenile court must independently determine probable cause for a violation of a “conditional admission agreement,” and must afford the juvenile an opportunity to challenge the probable cause.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 15
  • Go to page 16
  • Go to page 17
  • Go to page 18
  • Go to page 19
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 24
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs