• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Criminal

Abbott v. State, 19A-PL-1635, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 15, 2021).

February 15, 2021 Filed Under: Civil, Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey, N. Vaidik

In a civil forfeiture action, the res may be used for defense related expenses.

DeWees v. State, 20A-CR-1146, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 15, 2021).

February 15, 2021 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Tavitas

Indiana Criminal Rule 26 warrants that, where a qualifying arrestee does not present a substantial risk of flight or danger to self or others, a trial court should release the arrestee without money bail or surety subject to such restrictions and conditions as determined by the court. Moreover, our Indiana Code provides that, in setting the amount of bail or deciding whether to grant conditional pre-trial release, trial courts must consider all facts relevant to the risk of a defendant’s failure to appear, including factors enumerated in Indiana Code Section 35-33-8-4(b).

Anderson v. State, 21S-CR-28, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Jan. 26, 2021).

February 1, 2021 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

Before counsel’s appointment, a trial court must consider a defendant’s pro se motion, like a request for an early trial. After counsel’s appointment, this consideration is left to the trial court’s discretion

Fields v. State, 20A-CR-1799, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 26, 2021).

February 1, 2021 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

Notwithstanding a waiver of appeal provision in a plea agreement, a defendant who was sentenced contrary to law is an eligible defendant permitted to seek a belated appeal pursuant to Post-Conviction Rule 2.

Tate v. State, 19S-LW-444, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Jan. 28, 2021).

February 1, 2021 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: G. Slaughter, Supreme

Defendant was sentenced to life without parole. The record contained substantial evidence of both the torture and child-molest aggravators on which the jury could reasonably rely. However, because there was a third unchallenged aggravator, torture and child-molest aggravators notwithstanding, any error would not have altered the jury’s recommendation or the trial court’s decision to impose life without parole

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 48
  • Go to page 49
  • Go to page 50
  • Go to page 51
  • Go to page 52
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 327
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs